Mutual legal assistance
News & Blog
31 Aug 2022
NewsMozambique builds capacity to investigate transnational corruption and money laundering cases
Asset Recovery
24 Nov 2021
NewsMalawian Police gain essential skills to combat money laundering and recover criminal proceeds
Asset Recovery
3 Nov 2021
BlogInterview: Applying Peru’s non-conviction based forfeiture law in international cases
Asset Recovery
26 Nov 2020
NewsSpotlight on non-conviction based confiscation at UNGASS preparatory meeting
Asset Recovery
9 Jul 2020
BlogMutual legal assistance in practice: presentation for Indonesian anti-corruption officials
Asset Recovery
Publications
Case Study 10: Using full legal means to confiscate illicit assets in a time of war
This case study describes how Switzerland is putting to test a rarely used but powerful law in order to confiscate assets connected to Ukraine’s 2014 Revolution of Dignity, with the aim of returning these to Ukraine.
Key points:
- Switzerland is in the midst of administrative proceedings to confiscate around CHF 130 million in assets linked to the regime of former Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych.
- This case study examines the first of a series of cases concerned by these proceedings. Announced in May 2022, it involves over CHF 100 million in assets held by a close associate of the former president, Yuriy Ivanyushchenko and his family. They have been frozen in Switzerland since Yanukovych was deposed in Ukraine’s 2014 Revolution of Dignity.
- These efforts are significant as they may allow the return of assets to the people of Ukraine at a time of immense need.
- Just as importantly though, the move demonstrates how states can proactively seek ways to use their full legal toolkit to confiscate illicit assets linked to political exposed persons and ensure they are put to good use.
- It also demonstrates how states have opportunities to strengthen their adoption and use of established asset recovery mechanisms to interrupt the type of kleptocracies that have enabled the war in Ukraine in the first place.
Open-access licence and acknowledgements
This publication is part of the Basel Institute on Governance Case Study series, ISSN 2813-3900. It is licensed for sharing under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence.
The Case Study series offers practitioners insights into interesting and precedent-setting cases involving corruption and asset recovery. Many such cases are drawn from partner countries of the Basel Institute’s International Centre for Asset Recovery.
Suggested citation: International Centre for Asset Recovery. 2023. “Using full legal means to confiscate illicit assets in a time of war." Case Study 10, Basel Institute on Governance. Available at: baselgovernance.org/case-studies.
Tracing Illegal Assets - A Practitioner's Guide
A fundamental priority for law enforcement authorities dealing with financial crime is to recover illegally obtained assets and deny criminals access to the proceeds of their crime. The recovery of illegally obtained assets, however, requires first to successfully trace them.
Asset tracing refers to the process whereby an investigator identifies, tracks and locates proceeds of crime. In a traditional asset tracing investigation, there are three objectives: locating the assets, linking them to an unlawful activity so as to obtain freezing and confiscation orders, and proving the commission of the relevant offences.
This guide, written by practitioners working for ICAR, is concerned with a practical approach to tracing illegally obtained assets with a strong emphasis on the intelligence and investigatory aspects of asset recovery. It is addressed to an audience with a law enforcement background, including prosecutors, as well as to other practitioners in the field, such as lawyers, financial advisors, investigative journalists and activists.
The chapters of this guide provide practical guidance on the asset tracing process by addressing the pre-investigative and investigative stages, the mutual legal assistance process and the freezing or seizure of assets through the use of the anti-money laundering framework. They also address the use of offshore vehicles and digital currencies as means to hide the source of illicitly obtained proceeds.
It is not the intention of the authors to deal exhaustively with the entire process whereby assets are ultimately forfeited or confiscated. However, practitioners can benefit from an easy-to-understand handbook that guides them through the key and critical steps by stressing the strategic considerations as well as crucial checklists for a successful recovery of illegally obtained assets.